How long should you keep tax
records?
We have heard that one should keep records for at least three years, as the IRS has three years to examine your return.
There is a lot of wiggle room there, however.
Let’s look at a wiggle that repeats with some frequency: a net operating loss (NOL) carryover.
An NOL occurs when a business’ tax deductions exceed its tax revenues.
I include the word “business” intentionally. Nonbusiness income - think interest, dividends, royalties – will not generate NOLs, unless you happen to own a bank or something. That would be rare, but it could happen.
An NOL is a negative (net) number from a business.
How does this negative number get on your personal return?
Several ways. Here is one: you own a piece of a passthrough business and receive a Schedule K-1.
A passthrough normally does not pay taxes on its own power. Its owners do. If that passthrough had a big enough loss, your share of its loss might wipe out all the other income on your personal return. It happens. I have seen it.
You would go negative. Bingo, you have an NOL.
But what do you do with it?
The tax law has varied all over the place on what to do with it. Sometimes you could take it back five years. Sometimes two. Sometimes you could not take it back at all. What you could not take back you could take forward to future years. How many future years? That too has varied. Sometimes it has been fifteen years. Sometimes twenty. Right now, it is to infinity and beyond.
Let’s introduce Betty Amos.
Betty was a Miami CPA and restaurateur. In the early 1980s she teamed up with two retired NFL players to own and operate Fuddruckers restaurants in Florida.
She wound up running 15 restaurants over the next 27 years.
She was honored in 1993 by the National Association of Women Business Owners. She was named to the University of Miami board of trustees, where she served as chair of the audit and compliance committee.
I am seeing some professional chops.
In 1999 her share of Fudddruckers generated a taxable loss. She filed a joint tax return with her husband showing an NOL of approximately $1.5 million.
In 2000 she went negative again. Her combined NOL over the two years was pushing $1.9 million.
Let’s fast forward a bit.
On her 2014 tax return she showed an NOL carryforward of $4.2 million.
We have gone from $1.9 to $4.2 million. Something is sinking somewhere.
On her 2015 tax return she showed an NOL carryforward of $4.1 million.
That tells me there was a positive $100 grand in 2014, as the NOL carryforward went down by a hundred grand.
Sure enough, the IRS audited her 2014 and 2015 tax years.
More specifically, the IRS was looking at the big negative number on those returns.
Prove it, said the IRS.
Think about this for a moment. This thing started in 1999. We are now talking 2014 and 2015. We are well outside that three-year period, and the IRS wants us to prove … what, specifically?
Just showing the IRS a copy of your 1999 return will probably be insufficient. Yes, that would show you claiming the loss, but it would not prove that you were entitled to the loss. If a K-1 triggered the loss, then substantiation might be simple: just give the IRS a copy of the K-1. If the loss was elsewhere – maybe gig work reported on Schedule C, for example - then substantiation might be more challenging. Hopefully you kept a bankers box containing bank statements, invoices, and other records for that gig activity.
But this happened 15 years ago. Should you hold onto records for 15 years?
Yep, in this case that is the wise thing to do.
Let me bring up one more thing. In truth, I think it is the thing that got Betty in hot water.
When you have an NOL, you are supposed to attach a schedule to your tax return every year that NOL is alive. The schedule shows the year the NOL occurred, its starting amount, how much has been absorbed during intervening years, and its remaining amount. The IRS likes to see this schedule. Granted, one could fudge the numbers and lie, but the fact that a schedule exists gives hope that one is correctly accounting for the NOL.
Betty did not do this.
Betty knew better.
Betty was a CPA.
The IRS holds tax
professionals to a higher standard.
BTW, are you wondering how the IRS reconciles its Indiana-Jones-like stance on Betty’s NOL with a three-year-statute-of-limitations?
Easy. The IRS cannot reach back to 1999 or 2020; that is agreed.
Back it can reach 2014 and 2015.
The IRS will not permit an NOL deduction for 2014 or 2015. Same effect as reaching back to 1999 or 2000, but it gets around the pesky statute-of-limitations issue.
And in the spirit of bayoneting-the-dead, the IRS also wanted penalties.
Betty put up an immediate defense: she had reasonable cause. She had incurred those losses before Carter had liver pills. Things are lost to time. She was certain that she carried numbers correctly forward from year to year.
Remember what I said about tax professionals? Here is the Court:
More significantly, Ms. Amos is a longtime CPA who has
worked for high-profile clients, owned her own accounting firm, and been
involved with national and state CPA associations. It beggars belief that she
would be unaware that each tax years stands alone and that it was her
responsibility to demonstrate her entitlement to the deductions she claimed.”
Yep, she was liable for penalties too.
Our case this time was Betty Amos v Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2022-109.