New Kentucky Tax Amnesty Program

Kentucky has rolled-out a tax amnesty. It exists for a very short period of time: from October 1, 2012 to November 30, 2012. If this applies to you, you will have 61 days to apply.

The amnesty applies to taxes for periods…

·         after November 30, 2001 and

·         before October 1, 2011

You will be eligible if …

·         you did not file a return

·         you did file but are now amending a return

·         you did file but still have an outstanding tax liability

That last one is amazing. It indicates that Kentucky wants money, and it is willing to cut a break on assessed tax already due.

Certain taxes are not eligible, such as ...

·         your real estate taxes (as they are collected locally)

·         motor vehicle taxes (collected by county clerks)

·         tangible property taxes (again, collected locally)

What do you gain? You still owe the tax, of course, but Kentucky will waive one-half the interest and ALL the penalties.

What is the hitch? Kentucky wants your cash, so you will have to write them a check. There is a very limited exception for hardship, but even there you will have to pay-off Kentucky in full by May 31, 2013.

Consider this program if you have nexus with Kentucky but never filed, or if you have unfiled or unpaid sales taxes.

For more information you can contact Kentucky at 1-855-KYTAXES.

Ohio Offers Two Tax Amnesties

As part of the 2012/2013 budget bill, Ohio has authorized a general amnesty for selected state taxes, including personal income, school district, sales and commercial activity taxes.

This is an attractive amnesty program, although it does have one significant drawback. Under the program Ohio will abate all penalties and one-half the interest. Taxes eligible for the amnesty must have been due and payable as of May 1, 2011. This means that a 2010 individual income tax will be eligible (as it was due April 15, 2011), but a May 2011 sales tax return would not (as it was due June 23, 2011). In addition, you cannot have been previously contacted by Ohio.

Ohio expects full payment when you file these tax returns. Remember – this is a revenue raiser for the state.

The significant drawback? The general amnesty window is very brief: from May 1 to June 15, 2012.

There is a separate use tax amnesty that runs from October 1, 2011 to May 1, 2013.

Note: Use tax applies to purchases of taxable products or taxable services where the seller did not collect the Ohio sales tax. The use tax applies both to individuals and businesses. The use tax is the cousin to the Ohio sales tax. It serves to prohibit one from avoiding Ohio sales tax by purchasing items from another state (free of sales tax) and then bringing them into Ohio.

If one pays all use tax due on or after January 1, 2009, Ohio will waive or abate use tax owed for prior periods. There is also a non-interest payment program available for businesses not previously registered for use tax, although this option requires an officer to personally guarantee the tax debt. On the plus side, Ohio will allow the business up to seven years to pay the back taxes. Once again, you cannot have been previously contacted by Ohio.

Doing Business Across State Lines

Does your business lease property in another state? Do you have sales people who travel to other states?

You may have multistate tax issues.

There are many types of state and local taxes. Three of the most common are income tax, sales tax and use tax. These taxes may have different names in different states. For example, an income tax may be referred to as a franchise tax, or a sales tax may be called a transaction privilege tax.  The use tax is the twin to the sales tax: if the seller does not collect sales tax, then the purchaser may be required to separately pay use tax.

There is a new breed of state taxes that meld the above. Ohio has a commercial activities tax, which sprung into existence as a replacement to the Ohio franchise tax but bears closer resemblance to a sales tax.

Why should you worry about multistate issues?

A key reason is that states are facing severe budgetary pressures and are looking to aggressively assert their tax laws in order to increase their tax receipts. It used to be, for example, that you did not have to worry about collecting sales taxes for another state unless you owned or leased property in that state or kept employees there. This is now changing.   California, for example, wants Amazon to collect sales tax if it pays a fee to “affiliates” located in California. An affiliate (say a California band) has a hotlink on its website to Amazon. By clicking on that link, one is transferred to Amazon where one can buy the band’s CDs. California believes that is enough reason to pull Amazon into its sales tax regime.

California is not the only state moving to this "affiliate" sales tax theory. New York became the first to do so in 2008, and Connecticut, Illinois, Rhode Island and Arkansas have since passed similar laws.

Did you know that some states subject services to sales tax? If you are performing services in those states, you may have multistate tax issues.

If you do not know you have a liability, you cannot file. Did you know that there is no statute of limitations on how far back a state can go if you never file returns? You could wind up owing 10 years or more in back taxes, plus penalties and interest. Not a problem, you say, as I can file for refund in my state and get that money back. What if the statute of limitations for a refund has expired with your state, but there is no limitation in the new state demanding sales taxes. In that case, you are paying tax twice.

There is a long-standing tax theory called “nexus” that states have to meet in order to pull you into their tax regime. The states have been changing, and aggressively expanding, their definition of nexus. It may be that ten years ago you did not have nexus but that you do have nexus today.

Examples of nexus are:

• An office
• A phone line
• Inventory or supplies in the state
• Office equipment or other property
• Business license
• Employees acting on your behalf
• Employees attending a trade show in the state
• Independent contractors acting on your behalf
• Use of intangible property (like a trademark) in the state

Did you notice the one about the trade show? In 2007 the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts determined that a seller of dental equipment who attended a one-day trade show was responsible for collecting sales taxes on any sales generated at the trade show. The decision is not totally unexpected, as the salesman did generate quite a few sales and attended the trade show annually. However, many if not most tax planners would have missed this sales tax exposure by reasoning that it is only one day.

States are changing how they are apportioning or allocating multistate income to their respective state. It used to be that states would weigh sales, property and payroll evenly. Many states are now moving to sales only, with no weighting for either property or sales. This is an effort to more out-of-state businesses into their tax system. Why, some states will require you to treat income sourced to a non-taxing state as attributable to them! This is the “throwback” rule, and it is a transparent effort to increase their own tax apportionment.

What if you form separate legal entities to avoid nexus? For example, a manufacturer could have plants in several states but have a separate company make all retail sales.  Some states will assert “affiliate” nexus if any of the affiliated entities have nexus. One equals all. Once an affiliate has nexus, all the affiliates have nexus. In an income-tax environment this is referred to as the “unitary” concept.

It is important that you work with an accountant or advisor proficient in these matters. If you find that you have an issue (especially if the issue has existed for several years) that advisor will be invaluable to you and your business. An experienced advisor may be able, for example, to limit the number of back years that have to be filed with a state, as well as any penalties.

United States v. Michael F. Schiavo

Let’s look at the matter of Michael Schiavo (United States v. Michael F. Schiavo). He was a bank director in Boston and had invested in a medical device partnership. This partnership had monies overseas. Schiavo decided to tuck the money (approximately $100,000) away and not tell anyone. He did not report the income and certainly did not file the Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts report (FBAR) with the Treasury on or before June 30 every year.

The partnership gave him about $100,000 in Bermuda to play with. He failed to file the FBARs for 2003 through 2008, so he was playing for a while.

He notices what the government was doing with UBS, meets with his advisor and decides to do a “quiet disclosure.” This means that he either amends his income tax return, files the FBAR, or both, without otherwise bringing attention to it. That is, it’s “quiet.”

The IRS had offered an amnesty program for foreign-account taxpayers back in 2009. The advantage was that the government would not prosecute. The downside was that there would be income taxes, penalties and a special 20% penalty for not having reported the monies originally. This program expired in October, 2009. Schiavo decided this was not for him.

The IRS has introduced another amnesty program in 2011, again allowing foreign-account taxpayers to come clean. This time the program covers two more years, and the penalties have been increased to 25% (with some exceptions). The IRS wants to increase the burden to the taxpayer so as not to reward the earlier act of noncompliance.

So Schiavo prepares and files FBARs for 2003 through 2008 but does not participate in the amnesty. That is, he is “quiet.” An IRS special agent then contacts him, whereupon Schiavo amends his income tax return to include the unreported income he just reported to the IRS via the FBAR.

You read this right. He made a quiet disclosure to the IRS but did not amend his income tax return to include the income he had just alerted them to.

The IRS estimates that the taxes at play were about $40,000.

Schiavo was convicted. He now faces a fine and possible jail time.

You are going to take this kind of risk for $40,000 in tax? Are you kidding me? You cannot retire on $40,000. Heck, one can barely send a kid to two years of college for $40,000. What was this guy thinking?