A CPA Draws A Fraud Penalty

I see that a CPA drew a fraud penalty.

There is something you don’t see every day.

The CPA is Curtis Ankerberg. He practices in Oregon, which means that I could not have met him. I however am certain that I have met his acolytes.

He graduated in 1994 and did the CPA firm route until 2005, when he went out on his own.

Good for him.

The IRS pulled his personal 2012, 2013 and 2014 returns.

Should be easy for a practicing CPA.

During those years he prepared 50 to over 70 individual returns for clients. It doesn’t sound like a lot, but those are just individual returns. It does not include business returns or any accounting he may also have done.

He maintained an office-in-home, which meant that the IRS examiner came to his house. The audit started off on a bad foot. The auditor added up his 1099s for one year and found that the sum exceeded what Ankerberg had reported as income. Needless to say, the auditor immediately recorded a write-up.

Comment: Folks, if you want to chum the waters for an IRA auditor, this is a good way to do so. I am – if anything – surprised that the IRS computers did not catch this before the auditor even showed up.

Emboldened, the auditor now presented a list of documents he wanted to review.

Our CPA said sure, but he never followed up. He was creative with his excuses, though:

·      He had cataract surgery coming up.

·      He was awaiting the outcome of a complaint he filed with the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.

·      He lost his records.

·      The auditor was messing around with one of the years, as the CPA had already agreed he had underreported income.

·      He had not attached necessary forms to his tax returns because to attach them was a “red flag.”

·      He had bank statements but he could not turn them over because he could not see well.

Alrighty then.

That last one cost him and big.

If the IRS wants your bank statements, they will get your bank statements. You can play it nice and provide copies yourself, or you can stick it to the man and have the IRS subpoena them from the bank. The latter may give you a momentary rush of I-am-a-bad-dude, but you have hacked off an auditor.

What is the first reason that comes to mind if one refuses to provide bank statements?

Exactly.

The IRS agent poured over those bank statements like they were winning lottery tickets. Our CPA had again underreported income. In each year.

Can you feel the penalty coming? Oh, it is going to be a biggun.

What more can a disgruntled agent do?

The agent disallowed the following expenses:

·      Insurance

·      Taxes and licenses

·      Office expenses

·      Repairs and maintenance

·      Utilities

·      Interest

·      Vehicle expenses

·      Office in home

·      And others

This is not fatal. Just provide the documents.

Which Ankerberg did not do.

Our CPA is before the Tax Court explaining how he got into this mess. I imagine the conversation as follows:

“Your honor,” he said, “I had serious medical issues, and those issues constitute reasonable cause. I had cataract surgery, and before then I was really a mess. This auditor caught me at a bad time.”

“Really?” asked the Court. “We are curious then how you prepared all those tax returns for all those clients.”

“Braille,” replied our CPA.

“You continued to drive a car,” continued the Court.

“Self-driving,” explained our CPA. “It is a Google car.”

“Interesting,” noted the Court. “How about that 2014 return, the one after your cataract surgery?”

“Phantom blindness,” offered the CPA generously.

“Let us see. Too little income. Too many deductions. A tax professional who knew the tax ropes. Someone who never provided bank statements or other documentation requested by the auditor. What does this sound like? Let us think… let us think...”

“Aha! We remember now: they sound like badges of fraud.”

Bam!

BTW the fraud penalty is 75%.

Just provide the bank statements, Barney.

Has The IRS Noticed You?

My partner asked me today whether I thought we are seeing more tax notices. We are pretty keen on this issue, as tax notices – any tax notice – reflect badly on the quality of our work.  I would begin to question my dentist if I routinely received notices from the Internal Dental Service, the Ohio and Kentucky Departments of Dentistry, the Cincinnati Dentistry Division, …. You get the idea.

Have you heard about the IRS’ recent fishing expedition? It is called “Notification of Possible Income Underreporting.” There’s a name. Why don’t they just bash down your door and arrest you? 

What is causing this is the use of debit and credit cards. The payment settlement entities (think Visa) and third-party payers (think PayPal) are now required to relay financial data to the IRS via Forms 1099-K. The IRS has their nose into how much you are depositing into your business checking account. You can pretty much guess that the IRS is matching A to B and is sending out letters when they do not match.

There are four possible letters the IRS may send, each requiring its own response:

1. Letter 5035 – the softest of the letters. You do not need to respond.
2. Letter 5036 – you want to respond within 30 days as the IRS reserves the right to assess you.
3. Letter 5039 - you now need to complete yet another form – Form 14220 Verification of Reported Income. Lucky you.
4. Letter 5043 – if you believe that the return you filed is accurate, then you must provide the IRS with a written explanation of why you believe that. (Think about that sentence for a minute).  Again, failure to respond may trigger an assessment.

Now, a normal person would anticipate that the IRS would compare what a business reports as gross revenue to the 1099-K.  As long as the first number equals or exceeds the second, all should be OK.

Oh, to be young and naive.

That is NOT what the IRS is doing.

How can the numbers go awry? Well, a couple of very common transactions come immediately to mind: 

• The 1099-K “sales” will include sales taxes. Generally speaking, accountants do not include sales taxes in “sales,” primarily because sales taxes are not sales. A business collects sales taxes as an “agent” and is required to remit them to the state tax department. Does this sound like “sales” to you?
• The 1099-K includes cash draws by the customer. Say you buy something and take an extra $20 in cash. Again, most accountants would not report that transaction as a “sale.” Same reason as (1).

The IRS has created an alternate universe. How? Well, they did a study, apparently super-secret and better concealed than donor lists to Section 501(c)(4) nonprofit applicants or the tax records of the American Issues Project. This study has determined sales levels for different lines of business – dry cleaners, florists and so forth – as well as “average” proportions of debit and credit card sales to total sales. The IRS has one piece of this information – the debit and credit cards – so now it backs into expected sales (based on averages). If you report lower sales than that… BAM!... here’s your letter.

Why does this upset me?

(1)  This exercise is based on averages. The IRS is wasting a taxpayer’s time because somebody-who-knows-somebody-overheard-somebody-talking-about…. You get the idea. It would waste less time and possibly be cheaper for the government to just mug the taxpayer.

(2)  How much of a tax professional’s time – my time –are they wasting? Can I even bill for this nonsense? Last time I checked, the IRS is still not sending me a paycheck. Maybe I should start invoicing them.

(3)    Understand what the IRS is doing here: they are shifting an examination function onto the shoulders of the taxpayer and his/her tax advisor. The IRS can potentially ask for anything: maybe the name of the church you attend. It can then conduct a “study” to determine average donations to that church. Guess what? If you exceed that amount, get ready for a notice. Where does this end? If the IRS wants to examine you, then let them examine you! At least they would have skin in the game, as they would have to pay the examiner’s salary. Perhaps that would cool their heels a bit.  

(4)    The backbone of our tax system has been voluntary compliance. As the nation becomes increasingly bankrupt, the “voluntary” part is becoming laughable. The government – enforcing through the IRS – is forever wringing us for more information: for FBARS, for cost basis on the mutual fund you sold, for the tax ID number of your child’s day care, for foreign bank reporting (FATCA) on your account overseas.

Think about that last one. How would you feel if Japan required all U.S. banks to report to Japan on accounts owned here by Japanese citizens? And – to put the cherry on the sundae – slap a 30% tax on any U.S. bank obstinate enough to not comply with Japan’s decree? I tell you what I would do if I were a bank president: I would not accept accounts from Japanese citizens. Guess what foreign banks are doing to American expats. Congratulations, you are smarter than an average U.S. Representative or Senator.

Going back to my partner’s question: yes, we are seeing more notices these days, because almost every year the IRS finds new ones to send out.

Goodness knows what they will trot out next year.