No Tax On Overtime

 

Let’s look at the overtime tax changes.

This is one of the provisions from the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) that the president signed on July 4, 2025. It is retroactive to January 1, 2025, and we will be seeing the overtime deductions on individual tax returns filed in 2026 for tax year 2025.

Note that I said “deduction.” As we have discussed before, tax credits are generally worth more than a deduction. The tax impact of a credit is dollar-for-dollar. The tax impact from a deduction depends on your tax rate (if you are at a 22% rate, then your deduction is worth 22 cents on the dollar).  That said, we will take the break.

The key thing here is that the break applies to overtime, so you must be in a job that pays overtime. Multiple parties might address overtime requirements: the federal government, a state government, a union, a voluntary arrangement by your employer, but only the federal definition will work here.

The Code looks at the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which introduces us to the terms: “exempt” and “nonexempt” employee. Generally speaking, nonexempt employees are required to be paid overtime, whereas exempt employees are not. The overtime pay is defined as 1.5 times the regular pay rate for all hours over 40 and that itself over a 7-day period.

COMMENT: The definition of exempt looks to a duties test (executive, administrative, or professional). A CPA will be considered a professional and therefore exempt for purposes of the FLSA.

Let’s say you are nonexempt under FLSA. You next question should be: how is your overtime computed? The FLSA requires 1.5 times the regular pay rate. Let’s say that your employer pays double time (I wish). How much is your overtime and how much qualifies for the deduction?

EXAMPLE: You make $35/hour and your employer pays double rate for overtime. You have 150 hours of overtime for the year.

150 hours times $35 times 200% = $10,500

That is what you were paid for those overtime hours, but that is not the deduction.

We have previously discussed how the Code likes to take a common term and restrict it by placing “qualified” in front. Your qualified overtime deduction caps out as follows:

150 hours times $35 times 50% = $2,625

Note that the deduction does not apply to the base pay ($35) for your overtime hours. It applies only to the additional pay, and the additional only up to 50% ($35 times 50%). Chances are good that is not the way you think of overtime, but we are talking tax.

COMMENT: Not quite “No Tax On Overtime.”

The FLSA refers to a 7-day period. There are occupations (firefighters come to mind) that are paid on a different cycle. The Code allows for this variation, and we will not discuss it further.

There is a significant reporting issue for 2025 returns to be filed in 2026: the 2025 Form W-2 does not have a box to report “qualified” overtime. In fact, it does not have a specific box to report overtime at all, although an employer may use an available box (probably box 14) to report. The tax bill (OBBA) was signed by the president on July 4, 2025, a bit late into the year to reasonably demand retroactive changes in W-2 reporting. The new 2026 W-2 forms (for returns to be filed in 2027) will be changed to include the amount of qualified overtime.

But what are we to do for the 2025 returns filed in 2026?

First, it is a concern only if you are paid overtime. That knocks out quite a few of us.

Second, I suspect that tax preparers will routinely request a copy of your last 2025 paystub, if you are paid overtime. The stub should have information showing the calculation. Granted, the numbers may have to be reworked, but it is a logical place to start.

Third, your employer might voluntarily provide this information for 2025, in which case you likely have an attachment to your Form W-2. I suppose an employer could alternatively send you to a website for this information. There is a one-time reporting safe harbor for employers: if they tracked your overtime for the second half of 2025 (remember, OBBA was signed July 4, 2025), they can extrapolate to the full 2025 year. This safe harbor goes away for 2026, as employers will be required to track and report actual detail.

COMMENT: There is a somewhat similar W-2 reporting issue for qualified tips. The difference between the overtime deduction and the tips deduction is there is (some) existing tip reporting on the W-2. The tax preparer has a place to start. The preparer has no similar starting place for overtime.

Like the tips deduction, this is not an itemized deduction. You can get this deduction whether you itemize or not.

There is an overall limit on the deduction. If you are single, the limit is $12,500. If you are married, the limit is $25,000.

And this overall limit is reduced if you have too much income. Too much starts at $150,000 for singles and $300,000 for marrieds. Beyond that point, you will phase-out at a dime on the dollar.

If you are married, you will need to file a joint return.

You will need to provide your social security number to claim the deduction. Leave it out and the IRS will automatically revise your tax return and send you a bill.

A bonus will not qualify for this deduction. It must be overtime, even if the bonus is in lieu of overtime. Stand-by or on-call pay will not qualify either.

Like tips, the overtime deduction is for federal income tax only. It will not reduce your FICA taxes, and your state will decide whether you have a state equivalent to the federal tax deduction. Some states will; other states will not.

In case you were wondering: you cannot claim the overtime deduction and the tips deduction on the same income. One or the other, folks.

The deduction has a shelf life of four years. It will go away (unless a future Congress extends it) after the 2028 returns to be filed in 2029.

BTW, you can now revise your 2026 federal Form W-4 (telling your employer how much to withhold) to allow for your expected qualified overtime deduction. You did not have this option (directly; one could get there indirectly) for 2025. Why the difference between 2025 and 2026? Just look to November.

And there you have the new overtime deduction.

Deducting State And Local Taxes On Your Individual Return

You probably already know about the change in the tax law for deducting state and local taxes on your personal return.

It used to be that you could itemize and deduct your state and local income taxes, as well as the real estate taxes on your house, without limitation.  Mind you, other restrictions may have kicked-in (such as the alternative minimum tax), but chances are you received some tax benefit from the deduction.

Then the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act put a $10,000 limit on the state income/local income/property tax itemized deduction.

Say for example that the taxes on your house are $5 grand and your state income taxes are $8 grand. The total is $13 grand, but the most you can deduct is $10 grand. The last $3 grand is wasted.

This is probably not problem if you live in Nevada, Texas or Florida, but it is likely a big problem if you live in California, New York, New Jersey or Connecticut.

There have been efforts in the House of Representatives to address this matter. One bill would temporarily raise the cap to $20,000 for married taxpayers before repealing the cap altogether for two years, for example.

The tax dollars involved are staggering. Even raising the top federal to 39.6% (where it was before the tax law change) to offset some of the bill’s cost still reduces federal tax receipts by over $500 billion over the next decade.

There are also political issues: The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center ranked the 435 Congressional districts on the percentage of households claiming the SALT (that is, state and local tax) deduction in 2016. Nineteen of the top 20 districts are controlled by Democrats. You can pretty much guess how this will split down party lines.

Then the you have the class issues: approximately two-thirds of the benefit from repealing the SALT cap would go to households with annual incomes over $200,000. Granted, these are the people who pay the taxes to begin with, but the point nonetheless makes for a tough sell.

And irrespective of what the House does, the Senate has already said they will not consider any such bill.

Let’s go over what wiggle room remains in this area. For purposes of our discussion, let’s separate state and local property taxes from state and local income taxes.

Property Taxes

The important thing to remember about the $10,000 limitation is that it addresses your personal taxes, such as your primary residence, your vacation home, property taxes on your car and so on.

Distinguish that from business-related property taxes.

If you are self-employed, have rental real estate, a farm or so on, those property taxes are considered related to that business activity. So what? That means they attach to that activity and are included wherever that activity is reported on your tax return. Rental real estate, for example, is reported on Schedule E. The real estate taxes are reported with the rental activity on Schedule E, not as itemized deductions on Schedule A. The $10,000 cap applies only to the taxes reported as itemized deductions on your Schedule A.

Let me immediately cut off a planning “idea.” Forget having the business/rental/farm pay the taxes on your residence. This will not work. Why? Because those taxes do not belong to the business/rental/farm, and merely paying them from the business/rental/farm bank account does not make them a business/rental/farm expense.

         

State and Local Income Taxes

State and local income taxes do not follow the property tax rule. Let’s say you have a rental in Connecticut. You pay income taxes to Connecticut. Reasoning from the property tax rule, you anticipate that the Connecticut income taxes would be reported along with the real estate taxes when you report the rental activity on your Schedule E.

You would be wrong.

Why?

Whereas the income taxes are imposed on a Connecticut activity, they are assessed on you as an individual. Connecticut does not see that rental activity as an “tax entity” separate from you. No, it sees you. With that as context, state and local income tax on activities reported on your individual tax return are assessed on you personally. This makes them personal income taxes, and personal income taxes are deducted as itemized deductions on Schedule A.

It gets more complicated when the income is reported on a Schedule K-1 from a “passthrough” entity. The classic passthrough entities include a partnership, LLC or S corporation. The point of the passthrough is that the entity (generally) does not pay tax itself. Rather, it “passes through” its income to its owners, who include those numbers with their personal income on their individual income tax returns.

What do you think: are state and local income taxes paid by the passthrough entity personal taxes to you (meaning itemized deductions) or do they attach to the activity and reported with the activity (meaning not itemized deductions)?

Unfortunately, we are back (in most cases) to the general rule: the taxes are assessed on you, making the taxes personal and therefore deductible only as an itemized deduction.

This creates a most unfavorable difference between a corporation that pays its own tax (referred to as a “C” corporation) and one that passes through its income to its shareholders (referred to as an “S” corporation).

The C corporation will be able to deduct its state and local income taxes until the cows come home, but the S corporation will be limited to $10,000 per shareholder.

Depending on the size of the numbers, that might be sufficient grounds to revoke an S corporation election and instead file and pay taxes as a C corporation.

Is it fair? As we have noted before on this blog, what does fair have to do with it?

We ran into a comparable situation a few years ago with an S corporation client. It had three shareholders, and their individual state and local tax deduction was routinely disallowed by the alternative minimum tax.  This meant that there was zero tax benefit to any state and local taxes paid, and the company varied between being routinely profitable and routinely very profitable. The SALT tax deduction was a big deal.

We contacted Georgia, as the client had sizeable jobs in Georgia, and we asked whether they could – for Georgia purposes – file as a C corporation even though they filed their federal return as an S corporation. Georgia was taken aback, as we were the first or among the first to present them with this issue.

Why did we do this?

Because a C corporation pays its own tax, meaning that the Georgia taxes could be deducted on the federal S corporation return. We could sidestep that nasty itemized deduction issue, at least with Georgia.

Might the IRS have challenged our treatment of the Georgia taxes?

Sure, they can challenge anything. It was our professional opinion, however, that we had a very strong argument. Who knows: maybe CTG would even appear in the tax literature and seminar circuit.  While flattering, this would have been a bad result for us, as the client would not have appreciated visible tax controversy. We would have won the battle and lost the war.

However, the technique is out there and other states are paying attention, given the new $10,000 itemized deduction limitation. Connecticut, for example, has recently allowed its passthroughs to use a variation of the technique we used with Georgia.

I suspect many more states will wind up doing the same.