I admit that I am biased, but I am not a fan of filing
late tax returns.
Call it Murphy’s Law:
If anything can go wrong, it will.”
I am looking at a Tax Court order. An order takes
place while the case is at trial. Somebody makes a motion, the Court reviews and
decides. That decision is called an order, and they are common.
The IRS filed a motion that it sent a timely Notice of
Deficiency to a taxpayer.
COMMENT: A Notice of Deficiency (also called a 90-day letter, a NOD or SNOD) is the IRS determining that you owe additional tax and wanting to reduce it to assessment. Why an assessment? For one thing, the IRS (usually) has 3 years to examine and adjust your return. It has 10 years to collect an assessment. That alone is a powerful incentive.
There are rules, of course. The IRS has only so much
time to send the SNOD, and you have only so much time to respond to it. In
general, the IRS has three years from when you filed the return or when the
return was originally due, whichever is later. There are exceptions. A key one,
and one will talk about today, is if you never file a tax return.
Milton Thomas Roberts failed to file a timely return
for 2014. He received a notice from the IRS in 2015 asking about it. In
February 2016 he went to the post office and mailed four packages: two to the
IRS and two to New York state.
COMMENT: He was filing his 2013 and 2014 taxes with the IRS and New York – hence four packages. He did so correctly: he used certified mail. Yes, it costs a few dollars, but – if you ever must prove the mailing – those are the best dollars you ever spent.
About a week later the IRS acknowledged receiving his 2013
return.
COMMENT: Having the benefit of hindsight, one wonders why the IRS did not confirm 2014. To his credit, Roberts went online and confirmed that all four packages had been delivered.
For 2016 through 2019 Robers received notices from the
IRS about this tax year or that, but he never received a notice about 2014.
That changed in October 2019, when the IRS sent a
notice saying it never received a 2014 return.
Roberts did not immediately respond.
In February 2020, the IRS issued a SNOD showing over
$275 grand of tax due.
That caught his attention.
Roberts (re)prepared his 2014 return and sent it to
the IRS on or around June 2020. It showed adjusted gross income of $587 grand and
a small refund of $804.
What happened to his copy of the original 2014 sent in
2016?
No idea.
Having attracted unwanted attention, Roberts was now audited
for 2014. The IRS issued a second SNOD in January 2022 for $79 grand in additional
tax, along with the usual interest and penalties.
You already know they are in Tax Court. Both sides
agree that Roberts filed a 2014 return. Roberts argues that he filed twice –
once in 2016 and again in 2020. The IRS says: nay, nay; he filed only once and
that was in June 2020.
Does it matter?
Oh, yes it does.
Remember that the IRS has three years (barring oddities)
to adjust his return and assess additional taxes. Roberts asserts that he filed
2014 in February 2016. Add three years and the IRS had until February 2019 to
adjust and assess.
Roberts received nothing from the IRS in 2019.
Roberts says the IRS is too late. The second SNOD is
incorrect and without effect.
The IRS disagrees. They say they never received the 2014
return until June 2020. Add three years and they had until June 2023 to adjust
and assess. They were easily within the window.
The IRS just filed a motion requesting the Tax Court
to determine that 2014 was within the window and they had filed a correct and
effective SNOD.
Judge Toro denied the motion.
Why?
There is enough doubt as to what happened. Roberts had
certified mail receipts, confirmation from New York of receiving 2013 and 2014
returns, confirmation from the delivery company that all four packages had been
delivered, as well as a conspicuous absence by the IRS for three ½ years concerning
the 2014 tax year.
Judge Toro was not going to say that the IRS had
proved their case.
Mind you, that does not mean that Roberts proved his case
either.
It does mean that the case revolves on whether there
was a 2014 filing in 2016.
The IRS usually has the upper hand in such matters.
But Roberts brings the receipts.
You may wonder: does the IRS sometimes lose returns?
Oh yes. They have done so with me. I remember one
client specifically because it impacted a scheduled real estate closing. We
resolved the matter, but it involved considerable time and stress.
I will be keeping an eye out for the resolution of the
Roberts story.
My hunch: he will win.
But he is in Tax Court. He is not pro se, so he is paying
for an attorney. And he will keep paying, as a motion has been decided but the case
itself marches on.
Which makes me wonder: could he have avoided this by
simply filing a timely tax return?
As I said, I am biased.
Our case (or motion, actually) this time is from Milton
Thomas Roberts v Commissioner, Tax Court docket 7011-22.