It has been about a month since I last posted.
To (re)introduce myself, I am a practicing tax CPA. I like
to think practice allows a certain reality check on topics we discuss here. I
am hesitant to discuss topics I do not work with or have not worked with for a
long time. On the other hand, I can be acerbic while bloviating within my wheelhouse.
I have strong opinions, for example, with IRS administration of “reasonable
cause” relief for certain penalties. Here is one: work someone 80, 90 or more
hours per week, deprive him/her of adequate rest, maintain the stress meter at
redline, and ... stuff ... just ... happens. Maybe - if we had a government
union to drag high achievers down to the level of the common spongers - then stuff
would stop happening.
The downside is that this blog is maintained by a
practicing CPA, and we just finished busy season.
Let’s ease back into it.
Let’s talk about the big boy penalty - the BBP.
There are penalties when someone fails to remit
withheld payroll taxes to the IRS. It makes sense when you think about it. Your
employer withholds 6.2% of your gross paycheck for social security and another
1.45% for Medicare. Your employer is also withholding federal income tax. All that
is your money - your employer is acting only as a go-between - and not
remitting the tax to the IRS is tantamount to stealing from you. And from the
IRS.
I have seen it many times over the years. Sometimes still
do. Not grievous stuff like Madoff, but nonetheless happening when a business
is laboring.
I get it: the business is doing the best it can. I am not
saying it is right, but growing up includes acknowledging that a lot of things are
not right.
The BBP is a 100% penalty on the withheld employee taxes.
You read that right: 100 percent.
It applies if you are a “responsible person.” That
makes sense to me if you are the big cheese at the Provolone factory, but the
IRS has been known to consider ordinary Joe’s – somebody stuck at a miserable
job for a needed paycheck before another job allows an escape – to be responsible
persons. A common thread is that someone has the authority to write checks,
meaning the person can decide where the money (however limited) goes. Sounds
great in a classroom, but it can lead to stupid in the real world.
Let’s look at Rodney Taylor.
He has degrees in political science, speech, and theater.
He is multilingual. He has worked domestically and internationally. He now owns
a management company called Taylor & Co.
He says that he suffers from a limited learning
disability, one involving mathematics.
Couldn’t tell, but I believe him.
Over the years he delegated much of his financial
stuff to professionals such as Robert Gard, his CPA.
OK.
Gard embezzled between one and two million dollars
from Taylor. Some of those monies were earmarked as payroll tax deposits.
Gard had a heart attack during a meeting when his fraud
was unearthed. It appears that Taylor is a good sort, as Gard survived and attributed
his survival to actions Taylor immediately took in response to the heart attack.
And next we read about the lawsuits. And the insurance
companies. And banks. And insurance reimbursements. You know the storyline.
While all of this was happening, Taylor paid himself a
$77 thousand bonus.
STOP! Pay it back. Immediately. Not Kidding.
Taylor transferred funds from the company’s bank
account to a new something he was launching.
DID YOU NOT HEAR STOP???
You know the IRS had a BBP issue here.
Taylor argued that he could not be a responsible
person, as he was embezzled. He had difficulties with mathematical concepts. He
hired people to do stuff.
I do not know who was advising Taylor - if anyone -
but he lost the plot.
- Taylor owed the IRS.
- Taylor was CEO, hired and fired, controlled the financial affairs of the company, and made the decision to sue Gard. He couldn’t be any more responsible if he tried.
- Meanwhile, Taylor diverted money to himself while still owing the IRS.
The IRS gets snarky when you prioritize yourself when
you still owe back payroll taxes.
Bam! Big boy penalty.
Yeah, and rain is wet.
Sometimes it … is … just … obvious.
Our case this time was Taylor v Commissioner,
T.C. Memo 2024-33.
No comments:
Post a Comment