I have a tax
question for you.
It may seem
straightforward, but this issue actually went to the Tax Court.
You bought a
house in 2008. You took out a first and second mortgage.
During 2011
you fell behind on the mortgage. You caught up in 2012.
In 2014 you
received a check for $13,508 from the mortgage company. Included with the check
was a note stating
… based on a recent review of your account, we may not have provided you with the level of service you deserve, and are providing you with this check.”
The letter
also stated you could call with any questions. You did but obtained no more
information than we have above. You cashed the check.
The mortgage
company sent a Form 1099-MISC for $12,789 and a 1099-INT for $719.
QUESTION: Do you have taxable income?
Several
things are crossing through my mind.
(1) First, if you deducted the $12,789 as mortgage interest, the recovery of a previous interest deduction can be taxable.
(2) Second, how would you know without further detail from the mortgage company?
(3) Third, is their reporting on a Form 1099 fatal?
I admit, I
am thinking mortgage interest. To the extent the interest was previously deducted,
its recovery could be taxable under the tax benefit doctrine.
The IRS has
an easy argument.
Hey, you received a 1099. Two, in fact. A 1099 means income. If the 1099 is wrong, contact the mortgage company and have them void the 1099. Until then, as far as we are concerned you have income.
You have a
tougher argument. You have to show that the monies are from a nontaxable source,
but the mortgage company is not exactly baring its soul here.
You show the
Court the letter. You point out that you paid both principal and interest on
the mortgage. It is possible that the mortgage company is repaying you for
principal it overcharged.
Did you rise
to the occasion?
Here is the
Court:
We hold that petitioner presented credible evidence that the $12,789 was a reimbursement for a mistake that [...] had made on his accounts. This return of $12,789 of petitioner’s mortgage payments was not a taxable event and the amount is therefore not includible in income.”
All parties
agree that the $719 is taxable as interest income.
You did a
good job, but you had a big break.
The IRS
presented nothing other than they had received two 1099s. Most of the time that
is a winning play.
But you
could trump it by providing enough doubt that the 1099s sprung from a taxable
source.
You did.
You may have
had a sympathetic Court, though. You see, you served in the U.S. Army, and you
were serving in Africa as you caught up on your mortgage during 2012.
The Court
wouldn’t say, of course. We have to read between the lines.
Our case
this time is Jin Man Park v Commissioner.
No comments:
Post a Comment