New Business Tax Provisions

So what are the key business tax changes from the American Tax Relief Act of 2012? Here are the ones that caught my eye:

(1)  Bonus depreciation extended through 2013.

The bonus allows one to immediately deduct 50% of the cost of qualifying assets.  If you buy a backhoe, for example, you can immediately expense one-half the cost – and you get to depreciate the remaining half.  

(2)  S corporation built-in gain tax recognition period

OK, this one is somewhat obscure. Suffice to say that a C corporation that switches to an S corporation cannot sell its business until after several years have run. It used to be that the period was 10 years, then reduced to 7 and then to 5 years. The Act extends the 5 years for sales through 2013.

What this is about is allowing tax planners to restructure businesses, or parts of businesses, for sale, in the hope of spurring – or at least not deterring – business and job activity.

 

(3)  Expensing for certain film and television activities

If Peter Jackson had filmed The Hobbit in the United States, he would have been able to expense the first $15 million in production costs. Three-fourths of the movie production must take place in the U.S.

The Act extends this break through 2013.

(4)  Increase in Section 179 expensing

Section 179 allows taxpayers to immediately expense equipment used in a business. Normally this type of expenditure would be depreciated over time (barring the bonus depreciation discussed in (1) above). Section 179 however has a limit on the amount that can be expensed and the amount of assets you can purchase and still qualify for the break.

In 2011 the amount that could be expensed was $500,000 as long as assets purchased did not exceed $2 million. That dropped to $125,000 and $500,000 for 2012. The Act retroactively changes 2012 to and sets 2013 at $500,000 and $2 million.

(5)  Faster depreciation of leasehold improvements

The Act extends the 15-year depreciation period for qualifying leasehold, retail and restaurant leasehold improvements.  

For example, the new Mad Mike’s at the Newport Levee would have been depreciated over 39 years. Now it can be depreciated over 15 years.

(6)  Research tax credit 

The Act extends the research credit through 2013.           

This credit is available for improvements in the production process as well as to the product itself. Think Apple and Pfizer.

(7)  Work opportunity tax credit 

This is the tax credit for hiring individuals on welfare, being released from prison, collecting social security disability and so forth.  

The credit is not insignificant: 40% of the first $6,000 in wages. 

Who is this credit important to? Think Cracker Barrel and ....

(8)  Veterans credit 

Technically this is a subset of the work opportunity credit from (7) above. 

Unemployed and disabled veterans are a qualifying category for the tax credit, although the credit amount can vary from $2,400 to $9,600 depending on how long the veteran has been unemployed and whether disabled. 

(9)  The Nascar loophole 

If you were thinking of building a “motorsports entertainment complex,” the Act will allow you to take accelerated depreciation. You have to build it soon, though.

 This one could not be more obvious if Jeff Gordon ran over you.           

(10)   Cover over of the rum excise tax 

There is an excise tax of $13.50 on every gallon of rum sold in the United States. That would normally be a business-breaker, but the government refunds almost all the tax - $13.25 – to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands in the form of economic aid. This is called the “cover over.” 

By far most of the money goes to Puerto Rico.

However... 

Do you know Diageo? They are based in London and produce  – among others - Captain Morgan rum. A few years ago, they moved their production of Captain Morgan from Puerto Rico to St. Croix, which is in the Virgin Islands. It seems that the USVI was able to provide a (1) 90% tax break, (2) a bigger kickback of the cover over, and (3) an exemption from property taxes.  

     

(11)    The “Subpart F active financing exception”

You ever wonder how a company like General Electric can pay no corporate income tax?           

Well, one way is that they lost a lot of money in previous years. This provision is another way.  

The U.S. (generally) considers interest earned by a U.S. corporation anywhere in the world to be a passive business activity. Makes sense, as accountants could easily move interest from country to country. By calling it passive, the goal is to make the interest taxable to the U.S. There are exceptions, of course, and this is one. 

This provision came into being in 1997 and with a significant amount of lobbying by General Electric. Why? Think G.E. Capital, and you are on the right track. It allows one to establish a captive finance company overseas, generate profits there but not pay taxes on the profits until the money is brought back to the U.S. 

This provision has been extended many times since 1997. It has now been extended again.

IRS Penalties and First Time Abatement

I drafted a letter this past Monday. Later in the day I saw a report from the Treasury Inspector General of Tax Administration (TIGTA) on the same topic. Serendipity.

We have a newer client who set-up an S corporation in 2011. That’s fine, except that he had not spoken with an accountant and did not meet us until April, when his individual tax return was due. This meant that his S corporation return was already late, as corporate returns are due a month earlier than individual returns.

Sure enough, he received a letter from the IRS asking for $195 – because the S corporation return was a month late.

So I drafted a letter that included the following magic words:

The taxpayer requests first-time abatement under IRM 20.1.1.3.6.1. Tax year 2011 was the taxpayer’s initial year of existence.”

The “IRM” is the Internal Revenue Manual.

The idea behind the first-time abatement (FTA) is “get out of jail free.” You haven’t had problems with the IRS before, and the IRS spots you a mulligan.

IRS penalties normally do not work this way. One usually has to provide “reasonable cause”for why one failed to file, pay or whatever. Penalties can add up. There are two common ones:

(1) The failure-to-file (FTF) penalty is usually 5 percent of the unpaid taxes for each month or part of a month that a tax return is late, not to exceed 25 percent. If you file the tax return more than 60 days late, figure the minimum FTF penalty to be the smaller of $135 or 100 percent of tax due.

(2) If you file but do not pay in full, then the failure-to-pay (FTP) is usually one-half of one percent each month or part of a month that the taxes remain unpaid. This penalty can be as much as 25 percent of the unpaid taxes.     

The IRS can abate both penalties if one shows reasonable cause. A top-of-the-line reasonable cause is to get hit by a bus and be in the hospital. As you can guess, the IRS does elevate the bar a bit for reasonable cause. “I was busy” is almost a guaranteed loser.

Let’s circle back to the FTA. You do not need to show reasonable cause; all you have to do is ask for it. And with that we have the following from the TIGTA report:

“Penalty waivers should not be granted only to taxpayers or preparers with knowledge of IRS processes,” said TIGTA Inspector General J. Russell George.

TIGTA estimated that for 2010, approximately 250,000 taxpayers with FTF penalties and 1.2 million taxpayers with FTP penalties qualified for FTA but not receive abatement. The reason? The taxpayers did not to ask for it. TIGTA estimated the unabated penalties at more than $181 million.

TIGTA is requesting that the IRS review its procedures for penalty assessment, especially with an eye toward first-time abatement. For example, perhaps the IRS could send a notice but immediately apply the FTA. It would inform the taxpayer of the penalty and abatement, thereby saving on IRS manpower and reducing the number of times folks like me have to write an FTA letter. Sounds like a winner.

Until then, remember that first-time abatement is available. Do not be one of the $181 million.

What Are The New Individual Income Taxes?

Congress has given us a new tax bill – the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. It was passed by the Senate at approximately 2 a.m. on January 1 and ….. Actually, that fact alone tells you about the quality of this tax bill.

Let’s take a look at some individual tax measures.

(1)   The 2% social security tax reduction is gone. Everybody with a paycheck will immediately see their take-home pay go down.

(2)   The previous tax rates of 10/15/25/28/33/35 percent still exist, but ….

a.      There is a new 39.6% tax rate.

NOTE: The new rate starts at $400,000 for singles and $450,000 for marrieds.

(3)   The qualified dividends and capital gains rates do not change UNLESS…

a.      … you make more than $400,000 for singles and $450,000 for marrieds.

b.      If this is you, your NEW qualified dividends and capital gains tax rate will be 20%.

OBSERVATION:  Let’s be fair: 20% is not a bad tax rate.

You may have noticed that the above three changes pivot on $400,000/$450,000.

QUESTION: Can we rely on this throughout the new law?  

ANSWER: Silly you. Of course not.

(4)   Phaseout of your personal exemptions

Tax pros call this the “PEP,” and it is the brilliant idea to reduce (if not eliminate) your exemptions for yourself, your spouse, your kids and anyone else – once you go past a certain income.

QUESTION: What is that income level?

ANSWER: $250,000 for singles and $300,000 for marrieds.

(5)   Phaseout of your itemized deductions

You have the same reasoning as (4), but this time we are talking about reducing your itemized deductions. These are your mortgage, real estate taxes, contributions and so on.

QUESTION: What is that income level?

ANSWER:  $250,000 for singles and $300,000 for marrieds.

(6)   Alternative Minimum tax

Congress reset the exemption amounts to $50,600 for singles and $78,750 for marrieds – about in line with 2011.

This is good news because – if Congress did nothing – the exemption amounts were scheduled to decrease drastically. This would have pulled millions more people into the AMT, even with the same income as 2011 and would have made for some stressful client conversations.

Congress has also linked the AMT exemption and phaseout levels to an inflation factor. Finally and thank goodness.

Frankly, in my opinion the AMT may be the most important thing Congress did with individual taxes in this legislation.

(7)   Coverdell IRAs

a.      Remain at $2,000 rather than reverting to $500

b.      As an FYI, these are the “education” IRAs

(8)   Employer provided education

a.      The exclusion from income is renewed at $5,250.

NOTE: This will make a Tax Guy’s wife happy as she returns for her Master’s.

(9)   Student loan interest

a.      Remains deductible up to $2,500

(10)  The American Opportunity tax credit     

a.      Is renewed up to $2,500

NOTE: Good news for a Tax Guy with a daughter in college

(11)    The $250 supplies deduction for elementary and secondary school teachers

a.      Is renewed

(12)    Mortgage debt exclusion from income

a.      Up to $2 million is renewed but for 2013 ONLY

(13)    The sales tax deduction in lieu of income tax deduction

a.      Is renewed

b.      Good news if you live in Florida, which does not have an income tax

(14)    Above-the-line deduction for higher education

a.      Up to $4,000 – if you can meet the income limits

(15)    Child credit

a.      Stays at $1,000 per child rather than dropping to $500

Let’s go back a moment to the 39.6% tax rate (income of $400,000/450,000) and the PEP/Pease (income of $250,000/300,000).  In addition to this spaghetti, there are two NEW taxes in 2013. They are NOT in this bill because they already existed and were waiting to hatch, like something in the movie Aliens. They are ADDITIONAL taxes on top of the above. They are:

(1)   If your income goes above $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for marrieds, there will be a new 3.8% tax rate on your interest, dividends, capital gains and investment income of that type. This was courtesy of ObamaCare.

(2)   If your income goes above $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for marrieds, there will be a new 0.9% tax on your salary for additional Medicare. This too is courtesy of ObamaCare.

Did you see what Congress did here? Look at the income thresholds on some of these taxes:

               $200,000/$250,000

               $250,000/$300,000

               $400,000/$450,000

Try remembering all that and doing the math in your head whenever you get a client phone call.

Notice what the “true” top federal tax rate is: 39.6% plus 3.8% plus 0.9% plus 1.2% (approximate PEP/Pease effect) equaling 45.5%. This is Congress' thing now: sneaking taxes on you through the back door.

We will go over the business tax provisions with another blog.

The Mexican Fideicomiso and Foreign Trusts

This topic originated with Karl, who owns a condo in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico.

Karl was incredulous when I had him file a foreign trust tax return for his Mexican condo a couple of years ago. Why? Because the IRS was increasing their attention to foreign matters (think FBAR and FATCA, for example), and the penalties for failure to file had marched full-throated into extortion territory – at least for my clients, as I do not represent P&G, Toyota or their executives.

Under the Mexican constitution, noncitizens cannot directly own real estate within 50 kilometers of the coastline. This means that a U.S. citizen (Karl for example) has to use an agent to purchase the real estate. This agency is called a fideicomiso. Mind you the fideicomiso does nothing other than hold title – there is no bank account to pay taxes or insurance or repairs or anything.

The tax issue with the fideicomiso is whether or not the IRS would consider it to be a foreign trust. For many years practitioners (including me) considered it the equivalent of an Illinois land trust. The IRS treats the Illinois land trust as though it doesn’t exist; a technical way to say it is that the owner has a direct interest in the real estate and reports accordingly.

When the IRS tightened up its foreign reporting, it became unclear how they would treat fideicomisos. I called the National Office, for example, but received no clear-cut answer or leaning. This put me in a difficult spot, as the penalties for failure to file a return when assets are transferred to a foreign trust are the greater of $10,000 or 35% of the assets transferred. There is also an annual filing requirement (it is assumed that the trust is not funded annually), and those penalties are the greater of $10,000 or 5% of the value of the trust assets.

You can see how this gets very expensive.

So I had Karl file a tax return to report the funding (Form 3520) as well as an annual tax return (Form 3520-A). I am uncertain what the IRS got out of this, but Karl racked up additional tax compliance fees.

The IRS has recently published a Private Letter Ruling (PLR 201245003) stating that a fideicomiso is not a trust as that term is intended in IRS Reg. 301.7701-4(a), and that the beneficiary of the trust is to be treated as the direct owner. In other words, the fideicomiso is “invisible” to the IRS.

There are issues with PLRs, primarily that the IRS does not consider them as precedent to anyone other than the person to whom the PLR was issued. That means that – while tax advisors can look to them for markers as to IRS positions – they are not a failsafe if the IRS goes against you.  Karl is not completely protected unless he obtains his own PLR. Those cost money, of course. The filing fee alone can be several thousand dollars. Then you have my fee.

Don’t get me wrong: I have used PLRs in IRS representation before, and I have gotten greater or lesser traction depending on the examiner, manager or appeals officer and the magnitude of the specific issue to the exam. I suspect that, in the case of fideicomisos, the IRS is waving the flag and giving advisors a clue on their position and enforcement intentions. But one cannot be sure, and there’s the rub.

So how would you have me advise Karl? Would you advise him/her to get his/her own PLR (for thousands of dollars), would you rely on the issued PLR or would you have Karl continue filing Forms 3520/3520-A?

And remember: all we are talking about is a condo. A nice one, granted, but this "trust" has never even been near Switzerland.