I came
across an estate tax lien case the other day.
It has
become unlikely that one will owe estate tax, as the lifetime exclusion has now
gone over $11 million. Still, it can and does happen.
The federal estate
tax is an odd beast. It is a combination of assets owned or controlled at
death, increased by an addback for reportable lifetime gifts. This system is
called a “unified” tax, and the intent is to not avoid the estate tax by
giving property away to family over the course of a lifetime. In truth, the
addback is necessary, as tax planners (including me) would drive an 18-wheeler
through the estate tax if the lifetime-gift addback did not exist.
There is a potential
trap if the estate tax kicks-in.
Let me give
you a scenario, very loosely based on
the case.
Mr Arshem
was successful. He created and funded a family limited partnership with real
estate, stock and securities. He began a multi-year gifting sequence to his
children, each time claiming a generous discount for lack of control and
marketability. He had cumulatively gifted away $5 million in this manner.
He passed
away early in 2019. He died with an estate of $6 million.
On first
pass, $6 million plus $5 million equals $11 million. He is just under the
threshold, so he should not have an estate tax issue – right?
Not so fast.
The IRS
audits one or more of those gift tax returns. They argue that the discounts
were too generous, and the reportable gifts were actually $8 million. The
estate disagrees; they go to Court; the estate loses.
Now we have
$8 million plus $5 million for $13 million.
There is an
estate tax filing requirement.
And estate
tax due.
Let’s say
that the estate had been probated and closed. There no estate assets remaining.
Who pays the
tax?
Look over
this little beauty:
§ 6324 Special liens
for estate and gift taxes.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c) -
Unless the estate tax imposed by chapter 11 is sooner
paid in full, or becomes unenforceable by reason of lapse of time, it shall be
a lien upon the gross estate of the decedent for 10 years from the date of
death, except that such part of the gross estate as is used for the payment of
charges against the estate and expenses of its administration, allowed by any
court having jurisdiction thereof, shall be divested of such lien.
If the estate tax imposed by chapter 11 is not paid
when due, then the spouse, transferee, trustee (except the trustee of an
employees' trust which meets the requirements of section 401(a) ),
surviving tenant, person in possession of the property by reason of the
exercise, nonexercise, or release of a power of appointment, or beneficiary,
who receives, or has on the date of the decedent's death, property included in
the gross estate under sections 2034 to
2042 , inclusive, to the extent of the value, at the time of the
decedent's death, of such property, shall be personally liable for such tax.
It is not
the easiest of reading.
What (a)(2) means
is that the IRS can after the transferees – the children of Mr Arshem in our
example. There is also a sneaky twist. Income tax liens have to be recorded;
estate tax liens do not. They are referred to as “silent” liens and can create
unexpected – and unpleasant – surprises.
You cannot go to the courthouse and research if one exists.
What if
Arshem’s children received his assets and thereafter sold them? What happens to
the lien?
The children
are “transferees.” They are personally liable for the estate tax.
COMMENT: There are procedures to possibly mitigate this consequence, but we will pass on their discussion in this post.
The case is U.S. v Ringling. The moral of the story
is – if the estate is large enough to draw the wrath of the federal estate tax –
please consult an experienced professional. Think of it as insurance.
No comments:
Post a Comment