How much do you know about almond trees?
I know they are water-intensive and they come from
California. I am uncertain whether they can be used for furniture. I presume
they make good firewood.
So what would be a tax angle to this topic?
Growing almond trees.
Which gets us to farm taxation.
Farmers want (usually) to be cash-basis. This means that
they report revenue when they receive cash and deduct expenses when they pay
cash. It makes for relatively easy accounting, as one can almost get to a tax
return from adding together 12 bank statements.
Then there are those
issues.
I will give you one:
You buy a tractor-trailer load of
seed and fertilizer late in December. Can you deduct it?
The issue here is whether you have incidental or
nonincidental supplies. Incidental supplies (think printer paper to an
accountant’s office) is deductible when purchased. Nonincidental supplies
(think refilling an underground fuel tank of a trucking company) might be
deductible only when used and not before.
Spend some big bucks on that fuel and the trucking company
is keenly concerned about the answer.
Likewise, spend big bucks on seed and feed and the farmer is
also keen on the answer.
Farmers have some nice tax bennies in the Code, and a large
one is being able (in many cases) to use the cash basis of accounting. The Code
furthermore allows farmers to deduct that year-end seed-and-feed (with some
limitations) when purchased.
Nice.
That covers a lot of tax territory for row crops (that is:
one growing season).
Let’s go next to orchards. Apples. Pears.
Almonds.
What new issue do we have here?
For one, orchards take years to become productive. There is
no crop in the early years.
Is there any difference in the tax treatment?
Yep. It’s a sneaky one, too.
Let us talk about “uniform capitalization.” We have touched
on this topic before, but never concerning almond trees. I am pretty sure about
that.
The idea here is that the tax Code wants one to capitalize
(that is, not immediately deduct) certain costs associated with inventory, self-produced
assets any certain other specialized categories.
Almond trees are sort-of, kind-of “self-produced.”
Here is the fearsome tax beast in its canopied jungle home:
26
U.S. Code § 263A - Capitalization and inclusion in inventory costs of certain expenses
(a) Nondeductibility of certain direct and indirect
costs
(1) In general In the
case of any property to which this section applies, any costs described in
paragraph (2)—
(A) in the case of property which is inventory in the hands of the taxpayer,
shall be included in inventory costs, and
I would
argue that almond trees are “other property” per (a)(1)(B) above.
(2) Allocable costs The costs described in this paragraph with
respect to any property are—
(B) such property’s proper share of those indirect costs (including
taxes) part or all of which are allocable to such property.
Any
cost which (but for this subsection) could not be taken into account in
computing taxable income for any taxable year shall not be treated as a cost
described in this paragraph.
The (B)
above worries me. If this applies, then we have to “capitalize” real estate
taxes on those trees.
Let’s look
further at the definition of “property”:
(b)Property to which
section applies Except as otherwise provided
in this section, this section shall apply to—
Real or
tangible personal property produced by the taxpayer.
Real or
personal property described in section 1221(a)(1) which is acquired by the
taxpayer for resale.
OK, I am
getting worried. That (b)(1) sounds a lot like the almond trees. They are being
“produced” (I guess) while they are growing and nonproductive.
Is there an
out?
Here is
something:
(d)Exception for farming businesses
(A)In general This section shall not
apply to any of the following which is produced by the taxpayer in a farming
business:
I am
zeroing-in on (d)(1)(A)(ii).
What is the
growing (“preproductive”) period for almond trees?
Google says
more than 2 years.
We are
hosed.
We have to
capitalize real estate taxes.
COMMENT: Folks, that means “not deduct.” It gets expensive fast.
You know
what else gets pulled-in via the gravitational pull of Sec 263A(a)(2)(B) above?
Interest.
We better
not have any bank debt.
Arrggghhh!
We have bank debt, meaning we have interest. We are going to have to capitalize
that too.
The way this
is going the only thing we are going to be able to deduct is the postage for
the envelope in which we are sending a big check to the IRS.
We began the discussion by talking about how the cash basis
of accounting lets farmers deduct stuff when they pay for them. Then we marched
through the Code to find another section that tells us that we cannot deduct
what we could deduct only a moment before.
COMMENT: I have heard a common lament over my years in practice: when to stop researching? There is no hard answer, but this case is an example of why tax practitioners fear and ask the question.
Our case this time was Wasco
Real Properties I, LLC et al v Commissioner, for the home gamers.
No comments:
Post a Comment